Compare

How Mediastilo compares

Monitoring tools tell you what happened. AI writers write without knowing what happened. Mediastilo does both halves for a newsroom. Here is where each product fits, including where another one is the better choice.

How we differ

Not another monitoring tool. Not another AI writer.

Monitoring tools tell you what happened and leave the writing to you. AI writers write, but from nothing and in nobody’s voice. Mediastilo does the whole job, and your editor still decides.

Media monitoringNotices, you writeGeneric AI writersWrites, you find and checkMediastiloNotices, drafts, you approve
Finds the storyAlerts and clippingsWaits for your promptReads your sources around the clock
Writes the articleYou still write itFrom nothingFrom the source, ready to edit
Sounds like youNot its jobGeneric unless re-explainedLearned from what you publish
Every fact traceableLinks to coverageFills gaps by guessingEach claim tied to its source
Publishes to your siteNoCopy, paste, reformatWordPress, Ghost or webhook
Editor approves firstNothing to approveUp to youAlways, by design

Questions about comparing

Do we have to give up our monitoring tool?

No. Monitoring tools report on coverage; Mediastilo writes and publishes stories. Plenty of teams would keep both, and use each for its own job.

Why compare with ChatGPT at all?

Because it is what most desks try first. It is a very good general assistant; the comparison shows what a daily news desk needs on top of it.

How current are these pages?

Every fact about another product comes from its own website, and each page says when we checked it. If something has changed, tell us and we will correct it.

Can we judge for ourselves?

Yes. The live showcase is a news site Mediastilo writes every day. Read it, then come back to the page you were on.

Start publishing first.

Set up your sources today, or talk to us about a desk your size.

Prefer to look first? The live showcase is one click away. See it live